According to a new study, average retirement is projected to reduce the Superannuation Guarantee, which would increase it from 9.5% to 12% of the wage.
Industry Super Australia (ISA) work showed that the three average income levels of $ 50,000, $ 80,000 and $ 100,000, which would not increase the overdrafts paid to the current level of employers, would pay Australian retirements from 11.2% to 12.1% of final balances. Dollar balances would be reduced to $ 56,393, $ 89,589 and $ 108,178.
Reductions in retirement spending during the retirement age of 67-91 were between $ 28,310 and $ 34,566, as shown by the chart. These figures are smaller than the final balance-sheet reductions because they involve interaction between income from super- and early-retirement income. The work of ISA was made in response to a study published by the Grattan Institute claiming that the Australians have enough overcrowding now and would not need a SG increase from 2021-2025.
It also requires the cutting of supersumption levels, the taxation of all funds' income, the inclusion of family home into a pension security test and the raising of retirement age to 70.
Ian Fryer, research manager with mediation observer Chant West, said he did not believe 9.5 percent of SG would be enough.
"My research shows that many people are struggling and that 9.5 percent is not enough," Fryer said.
Women and low-paid workers are suffering
Martin Fahy, Managing Director of the Australian Private Equity Fund, took an exception on Grattan's report saying that it would cut the low-income retired outlook by cutting the superset.
"This report is about two in Australia, where highly-recruited high-level workers have fully funded retirement and the rest rely on the state," Dr. Fahy said.
Its application would prevent lower income workers from achieving reasonable financial independence, he said.
"The Grattan Institute wants to dismantle our world-class pension system and replace it with a model of two thirds of the population using the retirement age," Dr. Fahy said.
"In a world where there is a breakthrough workplace and where women's balance is 40 percent less than men, Grattan wants to leave its large societies excluded for retirement.
"It would be a world where few people can afford health insurance and retirement is a rare 1950s".
Few can afford voluntary supplementary services
Phil Gallagher, an occupational retirement expert with Industry Super Australia, stated that Grattan modeling had no relationship to the typical experience of SG's trust by exceeding its financial capacity.
"For all ages, only 12.2 percent of super-skilled workers make additional concessions, but Grattan seems to assume that everyone is doing it," Gallagher said.
"This increases salaries and saves significant savings in pensions. Accepted methods seem to reduce the contributions of lower wage earners, leading to pension projections that may rise by up to 45%."
Retirement is frightening
Robert Curley, the defender of the Independent Pensioners' Union, said that Grattan's assumptions did not take into account the challenges of life and their impact on the economy.
"It's good to make these calculations, but things are not necessarily like that," Curley said.
"I'm retired for 13 years and it still scares me. Even if you own a home, you may need to use the $ 15 or $ 20 000 000 to maintain and you may need to buy a car."
He often said that people have to spend considerable money on retirement to set them up and "retirement-based policy really needs a pragmatic view".
Independent economist Saul Eslake said that he "actually found Grattan's argument reasonably convincing" and that he had changed his opinion as a result of reading.
The current SG would provide enough pensions for many, and "Super's goal is not to move big bats or to help make more progress."
A new day owned by Industry Super Holdings