Thursday , May 6 2021

Vaccinations to lung cancer: more tobacco taxes and more laws



Lung cancer is the most lethal and almost 90% of the deaths are directly attributable to the consumption of cigarettes. Many cancers – like breast cancer – which were once a death sentence Now they are manageable. however lung survival rates remain less than 20%. Remedy may be tricky, but the medical community can stop this disease and eliminate the future deaths of this cancer.

I am a researcher snuff and I have studied several ways to stop the disease. There is a vaccine against cigarettes, and you do not need injections. Scientists have been researching ways of ending smoking for more than 60 years and preventing teenagers from starting smoking. Evidence gathered over many years shows that a strong preventive campaign, tight passes And higher taxes can reduce the number of smokers and motivate adult smokers to quit.

Smoking falls to more than half

Last year -1964- an alert from the General Surgeon the dangers of smoking caused enormous efforts to curb cigarette consumption. Media campaigns on new smoking dangers led to the first tobacco smoking decline in the US. The smoke-free policy, age limits and other restrictions on smoking and the tobacco industry that started in the 1980s led to further decline in tobacco use. Today, less than 15% of adults are smoking.

However, even though more and more Americans smoked, smoking rates remain constantly high the poorest. Most families with a higher socio-economic status live, work, and have fun in places where smoking is not allowed and is actually frowned.

Reducing smoking by more than 50% is one of the major public health successes in recent years, but the poorest Americans left behind. Research suggests that wider implementation of effective anti-smoking strategies could reduce lung cancer in this population.

Tell the kids the cost and the truth

Studies show that one of the first stages of smoking reduction is to change the way people think about tobacco. Successful media campaigns have to go beyond just warning about the health risks of smoking: they have to give young people new information that defines the images of tobacco ads. A recent national campaign to prevent youth smoking shows this strategy.

Started in 2014 The FDA, the campaign " Actual costs"Returning smoking habit, instead of the smoky picture of smokers, young people learn that each cigarette pays them something, including cosmetic damage, loss of dependence and control risk toxic chemicals what is tobacco smoke. longitudinal studies which were conducted for young people in four studies conducted in 2013-2016, revealed that this campaign will prevent some 350,000 young people from smoking in 2014-2016.

Campaigns in the media can to think about how people think about smoking and quitting, but do not force them to stop smoking or quit smoking. Laws and policies such as smoking in restaurants are a confirmation of these campaigns. By restricting the behavior of tobacco companies, retailers and smokers, regulatory measures force smokers to quit smoking and start off young people.

Moreover, while regulatory measures limit individual and commercial freedoms, most Americans they support the policy to prevent the use of tobacco. Secondary smoke happens to non-smokers and smoking costs us all billions of dollars health care. The benefits of smoking are not bigger than any legal burden. Moreover, these activities produce very little or no realization costs, and tobacco charges actually generate revenue.

Since the 1990s, cities and states they began to ban smoking in offices and restaurants to protect the non-smokers. These policies also changed the social climate that affects people's decisions on the use of tobacco. Experienced smokers and smokers started to get the message that most people do not smoke or consider it acceptable. Less teenagers started to smoke and more adults stopped smoking as a result of these smoke-free policies.

Although tobacco companies are opposed to bans, these policies are popular with Republicans and Democratic voters. In recent years, the ban on smoking has been expanded to private places. Many states deny smoking in the car if the child is present, while owners and real estate associations often deny smoking private apartments. And this year the federal government forbidden smoking inside homes (however, this policy does not apply to housing in Section 8).

Taxes without bad interpretations

In addition to being able to smoke, Many cities and states prohibit the sale of tobacco products to people under the age of 21. The social features of most high school students are not 21 years old, so it is unlikely that these teenagers have friends who can legally buy cigarettes. Needham, Massachusetts, Boston suburbs, was the first city to grow older for 21 years and the use of tobacco among young people fell compared to the surrounding area. California's proving evidence shows that this policy is limiting young people's capacity buy cigarettes.

Tobacco taxes are popular with many voters and they are beneficial to legislators. At higher prices, people buy less cigarettes and higher taxes generate more revenue. These new incomes may support those who are trying to quit smoking and fund programs to prevent smoking among young people. The District of Columbia recently imposed a tax increase of $ 2 in the package as cigarettes, and voters Montana and South Dakota voted on November 6 to raise tobacco taxes in their states.

Lung cancer is still a lethal disease, but there is a vaccine in our country to prevent this disease. With over 60 years of effective media campaigns and regulatory policy, legislators have the means to eliminate most lung cancer. Research suggests that wider implementation of these policies, especially in areas where poverty increases, would reduce smoking and prevent lung cancer. Stop smoking is difficult, but these popular evidence-based strategies can help.

Debate

New warnings for smokers

stowage

Download gallery


Source link