The UK Parliament has used little powers to engage in confidential documents related to the Cambridge Analytica interview.
In May this year, the UK government requested the presence of Mark Zuckerberg at the hearing to address scandal-related issues, where up to 87 million users were not misunderstood with voter profiling companies.
It was originally estimated that over one million UK users were affected.
Although Facebook's CEO participated in the consultation of the US Congress, the British MEPs meeting seemed to be small, and Zuckerberg ignored the invitation.
At that time, we said that such a request could have adverse consequences in the future – and it seems that this forecast has now come to fruition.
As the Guardian first reported, the British Parliament has now confiscated the confidential documents relating to Cambridge Analytica.
The cache for internal documents, which includes information on data protection and data management, as well as private businesses run by Facebook and Zuckerberg, is now owned by the UK Government.
The publication says that the conservative MP and Digital Media, Culture and Sport (DCMS), Damian Collins, called parliamentary powers to send a military team – responsible for maintaining order in the community – to a hotel where founder Six4Three stayed on a London trip.
TechRepublic: Facebook Privacy Scandal: Scam Scam
The founder of the US company was required to hand over the documents, but this request was ignored. However, when a representative of the armed forces appeared, the leader was given a two-hour deadline and a final warning.
Guardian says the founder then followed the parliament and told that fines and prison time could be his future if he still opposed. The documents then came in the government's possession.
Collins said that "we have not received any responses from Facebook and we believe that the documents contain very large public interest information."
Facebook has called for data cache to be restored. The documents originally came from a legal finding in the United States, where Six4Three and Facebook are participating in court proceedings in California. Six4Three argues that Facebook has completely ignored the privacy of the user, broke the trust, and also used illegal tactics to strengthen its market position.
Facebook, for its part, says that the arguments "are not merit, and we will continue to strongly defend."
See also: Facebook attracts researchers $ 40,000 in rewards for taking over accounts
"The material received by the DCMS committee is subject to the Sanoma superstitious protection provision, which limits their disclosure," the Facebook spokesman said. "We have asked the DCMS Committee to refrain from reviewing them and returning them as a counselor or Facebook. We have no other comments."
In short, the MP stated that, even if the documents were sealed in the United States, the United Kingdom Government has the right to publish them in the parliamentary interest.
The British Information Commissioner (ICO) fined Facebook for £ 500,000 over the Cambridge Analytica fiasco, fine by the social media giant intends to appeal.
Although the UK Government and Facebook are still in conflict, the latter is also linked to another political question across the globe.
CNET: Zuckerberg said it has informed Facebook makers using Android, not Apple, phones
Facebook, together with Twitter and other technology companies, are fighting against the new legislation that the Australian Government introduced in October and which companies claim to extend the site-block rules of piracy "far beyond reasonable limits".
Previous and related coverage